The price-to-earnings ratio: how to read stock valuations and what P/E actually tells you
The price-to-earnings ratio is the most widely cited valuation metric in equity investing—and one of the most frequently misapplied. Investors use it to judge whether a stock is cheap or expensive relative to its earnings. Used carefully, P/E is a useful starting point for valuation. Used carelessly, it obscures more than it reveals: earnings are cyclical, accounting choices matter, and the same P/E multiple means something very different in a 1% rate environment than a 5% one.
What P/E is
The price-to-earnings ratio is the share price divided by earnings per share (EPS): P/E = Price ÷ EPS. A stock trading at USD 100 with annual EPS of USD 5 has a P/E of 20. Intuitively, P/E measures how many years of current earnings the market is pricing into the share price—a P/E of 20 means investors are paying 20 years' worth of today's earnings for the stock. In practice, the ratio reflects not just current earnings but investor expectations about future earnings growth.
Two variants dominate usage. Trailing P/E uses actual reported earnings over the last twelve months—it is backward-looking and based on known data. Forward P/E uses consensus analyst forecasts for earnings over the next twelve months—it is forward-looking and subject to forecast error. Forward P/E is generally lower than trailing P/E in periods of expected earnings growth, and higher in downturns when future earnings are expected to recover from a cyclically depressed base.
What a high or low P/E implies
A high P/E implies that investors expect earnings to grow substantially, that they perceive the earnings stream as unusually stable and low-risk, or both. Technology companies and high-growth sectors routinely trade at P/E multiples of 30–50 times or higher during growth phases. A low P/E implies more modest growth expectations, a riskier or more cyclical earnings stream, or both. Utilities and financials in stable environments typically trade at 10–15 times earnings.
Cross-sector comparisons are largely meaningless. A technology company at P/E 35 and a utility at P/E 14 cannot be directly compared—their growth profiles, capital structures, and earnings volatilities are categorically different. P/E is most informative when comparing a single company or sector against its own historical range, or against a close peer group with similar characteristics.
The Shiller CAPE
The cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio (CAPE), developed by Robert Shiller, addresses a known limitation of the standard P/E: earnings are highly cyclical. A single year's EPS can be distorted by recessions, booms, one-off items, and accounting changes, making the trailing P/E misleading as a valuation signal at market extremes. The CAPE divides the current price by the average of the last ten years of real (inflation-adjusted) earnings, smoothing the cycle.
Campbell & Shiller (1988), Stock Prices, Earnings, and Expected Dividends, Journal of Finance, showed that the CAPE has statistically significant predictive power for long-run equity returns at the market level: periods of high CAPE (above 25–30 for the US market) have historically been followed by below-average returns over the subsequent decade, and periods of low CAPE by above-average returns. The CAPE is not useful as a short-term timing tool—high valuations can persist for years—but it is a meaningful input for long-run expected return estimation. The US CAPE entered the 2020s at levels above 30, associated historically with subsequent decade returns of roughly 4–6% annualised rather than the 10%+ available from trough valuations.
P/E and interest rates
The P/E ratio is not a standalone metric—it is directly sensitive to the prevailing risk-free interest rate. The theoretical basis is the present value of future earnings: a higher discount rate reduces the present value of any given earnings stream, compressing what investors are willing to pay. When the US Federal Reserve raised rates sharply in 2022, equity valuations contracted materially: the S&P 500's forward P/E fell from approximately 21 times at the start of the year to around 15 times by October—a compression of roughly 30%, driven substantially by the rate environment rather than earnings deterioration. This rate-induced multiple compression accounted for the majority of the equity drawdown that year.
This relationship means that comparing P/E ratios across different interest rate regimes is misleading without adjustment. A P/E of 20 in a low-rate environment (say, 1%) may be more expensive in real terms than a P/E of 15 in a high-rate environment (say, 5%).
Limitations
EPS is susceptible to accounting choices, non-cash items, and one-off adjustments. Share buybacks mechanically increase EPS by reducing the denominator (shares outstanding) without any improvement in the underlying business—a company's P/E can fall over time purely through buyback activity, even with flat total earnings. Negative earnings make P/E undefined and useless—common for early-stage companies, cyclical companies in downturns, and financials in crisis periods. The ratio also says nothing about debt: two companies with identical P/E but vastly different leverage profiles carry very different risk.
P/E in pfolio
pfolio displays current P/E metrics for equity instruments in the platform, allowing users to assess relative valuation across holdings and benchmark against historical ranges. For systematic strategies that incorporate the value factor—which includes low P/E as one of its signals—pfolio enables screening and weighting by earnings-based valuation metrics. The Shiller CAPE is available as a market-level indicator for long-run expected return context when constructing equity allocations. See equity investing for how valuation interacts with factor-based portfolio construction.
Related articles
Disclaimer
Get started now
